![]() ![]() Only thing that pilot needs to know, is that if wanted to guide rocket then target needs to be painted by laser with proper code. The only difference that is visually is the rocket is longer so it comes out of the pod. If ED would add APKWS II (public specifications has everything for 3D modeling by the dimensions, animation wise and even by the specifications of the seeker capabilities) it would mean that ANY module that can launch a standard 2.75" FFAR, is capable to launch APKWS II rockets. They are two separate projects, just like AIM-9, Mk.82, JDAM etc. Only thing missing is that ED has not included APKWS II in DCS World. The F-16C already has had EVERYTHING ready for APKWS II from the day one. It is only question of the time period of the mission that does the weapon exist or not, not about did it exist in the year that module use for starting point of modeling. It is ED responsibility like any Mk.82 or FFAR weapon. The developer doesn't need to make a own AIM-9.ĪPKWS II is same thing. ![]() But once the AIM-9 is launched, it all becomes from ED version. The module has only their own side of the system integration for it, like how you switch to it etc. They don't have to develop it forever.ĪPKWS II is not about module development as you claim. Limiting the arsenal is one of those methods, wether you like it or not. They have to limit the scope of the program, which is seemingly a concept you don't agree with (based on previous comments). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |